Our grade: 4 checks
Based on public data, not a full audit. See how we grade. Something changed? Request a re-grade.
Community rating
- 5 5
- 4 1
- 3 2
- 2 0
- 1 0
Trust in production
- Trust it - 75%
- With caveats - 13%
- Wouldn't - 13%
88% would recommend this server
How reviewers scored it
- Setup & docs 4.4
- Auth experience 4.6
- Reliability 4.0
- Maintainer responsiveness 4.6
Why it got an A
Zoom's own hosted Meetings MCP server at https://zoom.us/mcp/meeting/streamable, over HTTPS with OAuth 2.1 and PKCE and no API key. Zoom also documents an SSE endpoint at https://zoom.us/mcp/meeting/sse, and regional gateways (mcp.zoom.us plus EU, AU, CA, IN, SA, SG and US variants). Zoom runs several other official servers for other products, such as Chat, Whiteboard, Workspace, Workflows, Zoom Rooms, Contact Center and Zoom Phone (the Phone set has 13 discovery servers of about 100 tools), each its own server; this listing covers the Meetings one. Access follows the scopes you grant, rate limits apply per account, and the docs require an account with admin or developer authorization. No advisories on record. Biggest deduction: the servers are closed source with no repo or versioned releases, so maintenance rests on Zoom's dated changelog (latest verified entry October 2026) and sits one band lower; Zoom's docs page for the Meetings server doesn't list its tools or scopes, so check the scopes on the consent screen before approving.
How to connect
Hosted: https://zoom.us/mcp/meeting/streamable (OAuth 2.1 with PKCE; needs a Zoom account with admin or developer authorization)
Is Zoom MCP (Meetings) safe?
Is Zoom MCP (Meetings) safe to use?
Zoom MCP (Meetings) grades A (strong public trust signals). Upkeep is hard to verify (closed source or a single maintainer), so pin the version you tested.
Does Zoom MCP (Meetings) have known vulnerabilities?
Not in our current data: it has no open CVEs or advisories. We re-check as new ones are published.
Does Zoom MCP (Meetings) support authentication?
Yes. It requires a login, so access can be tied to a person or a scoped key.
Alternatives in Collaboration
- A Docusign MCP ServerOfficial hosted Docusign server that lets an AI agent create and send envelopes, track signing and search agreements, with OAuth sign-in.
- A Google Drive MCP ServerOfficial Google-hosted Drive server (Developer Preview) to search, read, download, create, and copy files, with scoped OAuth.
- A Pragor Project Board MCP ServerHosted server that connects an agent to a Pragor project board to read and update messages, tasks and operations, with a per-agent token limited to its project role.
- A Slack MCP ServerOfficial hosted Slack server to search and read messages, files, and canvases, and send messages as you.
- A monday.com MCPmonday.com's official MCP server, hosted at mcp.monday.com or run locally from npm, to read and update boards, items, columns, updates and forms.
Community reviews
Does the job, docs could be better
I like it, with reservations. The scope options are worth reading carefully, the defaults are broader than I wanted. Auth is handled properly, and revoking access later was one click. Recommended, with sensible guardrails.
Used for Turning chat threads into tasks
- Setup & docs 3/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 2/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Trustworthy enough for real work
Clear tool names, sensible outputs, very few surprises. I like that access goes through a proper sign-in instead of a long-lived secret on disk. The OAuth flow worked first time in Claude Code. You can tell it is actively maintained, the rough edges keep getting fixed. It is in our production agent and I sleep fine.
Used for Drafting announcements
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 5/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Does what it says, no drama
Simple to set up in Cursor, simple to reason about. Narrowing the scopes took ten minutes and made me much happier running it. Sign-in flow was painless and I never had to paste a key into a config file. Easy recommendation.
Used for Meeting prep from shared docs
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Earned a permanent spot in my config
Replaced a homegrown script with Zoom MCP (Meetings) and have not looked back. The OAuth flow worked first time in Claude Code. Scoped the token to just what the agent needs and it respected that. Happy to run it in production.
Used for Keeping project boards up to date
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 5/5
- Reliability 3/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Clean integration, sensible permissions
Hooked Zoom MCP (Meetings) into Claude Code and it worked on the first try. Auth is handled properly, and revoking access later was one click. Releases come often and the changelog is clear. Good choice if you need Zoom (Meetings) in your agent.
Used for Summarising channels I missed
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 5/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
The Zoom (Meetings) integration I wanted
Installed it on a Friday, it was part of my workflow by Monday. I would prefer to read the code, but the hosted service has been dependable. I like that access goes through a proper sign-in instead of a long-lived secret on disk. Updates land regularly, and nothing broke when I upgraded. Would recommend without hesitation.
Used for Searching old conversations for decisions
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 5/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Solid core, fiddly setup
Works well enough for what I need. Scoped the token to just what the agent needs and it respected that.
Used for Keeping project boards up to date
- Setup & docs 3/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 3/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Our team uses it every day
Started with it as an experiment, now it is a fixture. Sign-in flow was painless and I never had to paste a key into a config file. Being closed source, I cannot audit it, but the vendor has been responsive.
Used for Posting daily standup summaries
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 5/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Write a review
Ran this server? Tell other teams how it went. You get one review per server. We email you a link to confirm it, then an editor checks it before it goes up. We never show your email.