Our grade: 4 checks
Based on public data, not a full audit. See how we grade. Something changed? Request a re-grade.
Community rating
- 5 5
- 4 5
- 3 3
- 2 1
- 1 0
Trust in production
- Trust it - 64%
- With caveats - 14%
- Wouldn't - 21%
71% would recommend this server
How reviewers scored it
- Setup & docs 4.1
- Auth experience 3.7
- Reliability 4.1
- Maintainer responsiveness 4.5
Why it got a B
An independent developer's hosted library of CC0 sound effects for apps and games. Its four tools, marked read-only, find a sound by event, set or description and return file links. With no key you get 20 tool calls and 5 downloads a day per network. A free account's key raises that to 100 and 20, and a pack ($9.90 for 30 days or $69 for a year) adds WAV and lifts the limits to a fair-use cap. Go by the API docs and the live server on this: the repo README still lists 20 keyless downloads and generation tools, and the 5 November 2026 changelog closed generation to new users and removed those tools from the MCP list. Every sound is AI-generated or synthesized and comes "as is", so listen before you ship one. The privacy policy says search words are stored, with no automatic deletion schedule, so keep confidential project details out of queries. The npm package's "sfxmint mcp" mode only forwards calls to the same endpoint. No advisories on record. Biggest deduction: the repo holds only client config and a skill, as its own security note says (the about page says the server is developed there), so the hosted code is closed source and, with one named developer, maintenance is scored one band lower.
How to connect
// Cursor / generic mcpServers config (README)
{ "mcpServers": { "sfxmint": { "url": "https://sfxmint.com/mcp" } } }claude mcp add --transport http sfxmint https://sfxmint.com/mcpIs SFXMint MCP Server safe?
Is SFXMint MCP Server safe to use?
SFXMint MCP Server grades B (solid, with minor gaps). Login is optional, so check that it is turned on in your setup. Upkeep is hard to verify (closed source or a single maintainer), so pin the version you tested.
Does SFXMint MCP Server have known vulnerabilities?
Not in our current data: it has no open CVEs or advisories. We re-check as new ones are published.
Does SFXMint MCP Server support authentication?
Optionally. It can run with a login, but it does not require one, so turn it on.
Alternatives in Developer Tools
- A Atlassian Rovo MCP ServerOfficial hosted Atlassian server for Jira, Confluence, Jira Service Management, Compass, Bitbucket, Loom, Goals, Projects, and Teams, with OAuth 2.1 sign-in.
- A Buildkite MCP ServerOfficial Buildkite server for pipelines, builds, jobs, logs, annotations, and Test Engine data, hosted or local.
- A Dynatrace Remote MCP ServerDynatrace's hosted MCP server, running inside your Dynatrace SaaS environment, to run and explain DQL, look into problems, vulnerabilities and Kubernetes events, and forecast time series.
- A GitHub MCP ServerOfficial GitHub server for repos, issues, pull requests, Actions, and code security, hosted or local.
- A GitLab MCP ServerGitLab's built-in MCP server for projects, merge requests, work items, code, and CI pipelines, on GitLab.com or your own instance.
Embed this badge
[](https://trustedmcp.io/servers/sfxmint-mcp)<a href="https://trustedmcp.io/servers/sfxmint-mcp"><img src="https://trustedmcp.io/badge/sfxmint-mcp.svg" alt="TrustedMCP grade B" height="80"></a>Community reviews
Promising, a bit raw
It does the job, but it took some tweaking. Auth is optional, which is convenient locally. I turned it on before sharing it with the team. Updates land regularly, and nothing broke when I upgraded.
Used for Internal developer assistant
- Setup & docs 3/5
- Auth experience 2/5
- Reliability 3/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Surprisingly polished
Of the SFXMint integrations I tried, this one is the most predictable. Updates land regularly, and nothing broke when I upgraded.
Used for Debugging sessions in Cursor
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 3/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Does what it says, no drama
Hooked SFXMint MCP Server into Claude Code and it worked on the first try. I run it with auth enabled. Without it I would not let it near anything shared. I would prefer to read the code, but the hosted service has been dependable. Updates land regularly, and nothing broke when I upgraded.
Used for Looking up SFXMint data without leaving the editor
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
The SFXMint integration I wanted
Clear tool names, sensible outputs, very few surprises. Being closed source, I cannot audit it, but the vendor has been responsive. Would recommend without hesitation.
Used for Automating release notes
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Mixed feelings after two weeks
Useful tool, though I would not hand it to a junior unsupervised. I would prefer to read the code, but the hosted service has been dependable. I run it with auth enabled. Without it I would not let it near anything shared. Filed an issue and got a reply within two days. Keeping it to local experiments for now.
Used for CI failure investigation
- Setup & docs 3/5
- Auth experience 2/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Good defaults, good docs
Set this up for our team after comparing a few options. I would prefer to read the code, but the hosted service has been dependable. I run it with auth enabled. Without it I would not let it near anything shared.
Used for Debugging sessions in Cursor
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 5/5
- Reliability 3/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Trustworthy enough for real work
Our agents call this dozens of times a day. Releases come often and the changelog is clear. Turned on read-only mode on day one, highly recommend doing the same. Auth is optional, which is convenient locally. I turned it on before sharing it with the team. Easy recommendation.
Used for Keeping project tickets in sync with code changes
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Quietly reliable
Installed it on a Friday, it was part of my workflow by Monday. Read-only mode is the first thing I enable, and it covers most of what I need. Filed an issue and got a reply within two days. Auth is optional, which is convenient locally. I turned it on before sharing it with the team.
Used for Letting a coding agent open and triage issues
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 3/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Solid core, fiddly setup
Took longer to configure than I expected. Turned on read-only mode on day one, highly recommend doing the same. Fine in production if you sandbox it.
Used for Pairing with Claude Code on a monorepo
- Setup & docs 3/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Saves me a context switch every hour
Started with it as an experiment, now it is a fixture. Out of the box it runs without sign-in, so remember to enable auth before exposing it anywhere. It is in our production agent and I sleep fine.
Used for Generating boilerplate from existing patterns
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 5/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Exactly what I needed from SFXMint
I use this almost daily. Out of the box it runs without sign-in, so remember to enable auth before exposing it anywhere. Good choice if you need SFXMint in your agent.
Used for Onboarding new devs with an agent that answers repo questions
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Set it up once, forgot about it
Tried it on a side project first, then rolled it out at work. Turned on read-only mode on day one, highly recommend doing the same. Out of the box it runs without sign-in, so remember to enable auth before exposing it anywhere. Happy to run it in production.
Used for Scripting routine maintenance tasks
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Earned a permanent spot in my config
Simple to set up in Cursor, simple to reason about. Read-only mode is the first thing I enable, and it covers most of what I need. You can tell it is actively maintained, the rough edges keep getting fixed. Auth is optional, which is convenient locally. I turned it on before sharing it with the team. Happy to run it in production.
Used for Scripting routine maintenance tasks
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 5/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Fine for a demo, not for prod
It works in a demo, but things got shaky under real use. Out of the box it runs without sign-in, so remember to enable auth before exposing it anywhere. Releases come often and the changelog is clear. Hosted endpoint means no local process to babysit. Not something I would put in production yet.
Used for Code review summaries for pull requests
- Setup & docs 2/5
- Auth experience 3/5
- Reliability 3/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Write a review
Ran this server? Tell other teams how it went. You get one review per server. We email you a link to confirm it, then an editor checks it before it goes up. We never show your email.