VendorLovable
Connects overhttp

Our grade: 4 checks

Login Scoped login by default
Upkeep Moderate · 2026-07
Known bugs 0 open
Connection http

Based on public data, not a full audit. See how we grade. Something changed? Request a re-grade.

Community rating

4.3 10 reviews
70% would trust it in production
  • 5 5
  • 4 3
  • 3 2
  • 2 0
  • 1 0

Trust in production

  • Trust it - 70%
  • With caveats - 10%
  • Wouldn't - 20%

80% would recommend this server

How reviewers scored it

  • Setup & docs 4.0
  • Auth experience 4.5
  • Reliability 4.2
  • Maintainer responsiveness 3.5

Why it got an A

Lovable's own server, hosted over HTTPS, with OAuth 2.1 sign-in as the only login (no API keys) and scopes for reading and writing projects and workspaces. It can spend money and publish: create_project and send_message use your Lovable build credits, deploy_project puts the app on a public lovable.app URL, and query_database runs SQL with your full database permissions, writes and schema changes included. Lovable's docs don't say whether the agent asks first, so keep your client's auto-run setting off. Biggest deduction: the server is closed source, so this grade rests on Lovable's documentation and the lovablelabs/mcp repo (Lovable's own GitHub org, but only the plugin packaging and a README, no server code), and maintenance scores one band lower because that repo's last commit was 2026-07-13. The docs give no dated changelog. On Enterprise workspaces an admin must switch on third-party MCP clients first.

How to connect

Hosted: https://mcp.lovable.dev (OAuth sign-in on first use); Claude Code: claude mcp add --transport http lovable https://mcp.lovable.dev

Is Lovable MCP Server safe?

Is Lovable MCP Server safe to use?

Lovable MCP Server grades A (strong public trust signals). Updates are occasional, so fixes may be slow to arrive.

Does Lovable MCP Server have known vulnerabilities?

Not in our current data: it has no open CVEs or advisories. We re-check as new ones are published.

Does Lovable MCP Server support authentication?

Yes. It requires a login, so access can be tied to a person or a scoped key.

Embed this badge

Maintain this server? Add the grade to your README.

TrustedMCP grade A

Markdown

[![TrustedMCP grade A](https://trustedmcp.io/badge/lovable-mcp.svg)](https://trustedmcp.io/servers/lovable-mcp)

HTML

<a href="https://trustedmcp.io/servers/lovable-mcp"><img src="https://trustedmcp.io/badge/lovable-mcp.svg" alt="TrustedMCP grade A" height="80"></a>

Community reviews

Amara Okeke Full-stack developer
Trusts in production Recommends

The Lovable integration I wanted

Installed it on a Friday, it was part of my workflow by Monday. Hosted endpoint means no local process to babysit. I like that access goes through a proper sign-in instead of a long-lived secret on disk. Would recommend without hesitation.

Used for Reading logs during incidents

  • Setup & docs 5/5
  • Auth experience 5/5
  • Reliability 5/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Jakub Nowak DevOps engineer
Trusts in production Recommends

Saves me a context switch every hour

Clear tool names, sensible outputs, very few surprises. Nothing to install, I just point the client at the URL. Being closed source, I cannot audit it, but the vendor has been responsive. Happy to run it in production.

Used for Managing preview environments

  • Setup & docs 3/5
  • Auth experience 4/5
  • Reliability 3/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Maya Johnson CTO, early-stage startup
Trusts in production Recommends

Does what it says, no drama

Hooked Lovable MCP Server into Claude Code and it worked on the first try. Scoped the token to just what the agent needs and it respected that. Being official from Lovable counts for a lot when I pitch it to security. Happy to run it in production.

Used for Managing preview environments

  • Setup & docs 5/5
  • Auth experience 4/5
  • Reliability 5/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Yuki Tanaka Indie hacker
Would not trust in production

Promising, a bit raw

Useful tool, though I would not hand it to a junior unsupervised. Issues get answered eventually. Not fast, not abandoned. I will check back in a few releases.

Used for Inventory of what is running where

  • Setup & docs 3/5
  • Auth experience 5/5
  • Reliability 4/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Felix Wagner SRE
Trusts in production Recommends

No complaints after a month

Started with it as an experiment, now it is a fixture. Sign-in flow was painless and I never had to paste a key into a config file. Nothing to install, I just point the client at the URL. Gave it its own API key so I can revoke it without breaking anything else.

Used for Inventory of what is running where

  • Setup & docs 5/5
  • Auth experience 5/5
  • Reliability 4/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Daniel Kim Developer, healthtech
Trusts with caveats Recommends

Surprisingly polished

I use this almost daily. The OAuth flow worked first time in Claude Code. Auth is handled properly, and revoking access later was one click. Recommended, with sensible guardrails.

Used for Cost checks across projects

  • Setup & docs 3/5
  • Auth experience 3/5
  • Reliability 4/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Samir Khan Platform engineer
Trusts in production Recommends

Easy win for our agent setup

Replaced a homegrown script with Lovable MCP Server and have not looked back. Hosted endpoint means no local process to babysit. Gave it its own API key so I can revoke it without breaking anything else. It is in our production agent and I sleep fine.

Used for Checking deploy status from chat

  • Setup & docs 5/5
  • Auth experience 5/5
  • Reliability 5/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Emily Chen Backend engineer
Trusts in production Recommends

Earned a permanent spot in my config

Tried it on a side project first, then rolled it out at work. Nothing to install, I just point the client at the URL. I would prefer to read the code, but the hosted service has been dependable. Auth is handled properly, and revoking access later was one click. Good choice if you need Lovable in your agent.

Used for Spinning up test resources

  • Setup & docs 5/5
  • Auth experience 5/5
  • Reliability 5/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Andre Dubois Solo founder
Trusts in production Recommends

Good defaults, good docs

Simple to set up in Cursor, simple to reason about. Scoped the token to just what the agent needs and it respected that. Easy recommendation.

Used for Spinning up test resources

  • Setup & docs 3/5
  • Auth experience 5/5
  • Reliability 4/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Anna Virtanen ML engineer
Would not trust in production

Useful, with a few rough edges

Some tools are great, a couple feel half finished. Release pace is moderate, so I pin a version and check in monthly. Not something I would put in production yet.

Used for Cost checks across projects

  • Setup & docs 3/5
  • Auth experience 4/5
  • Reliability 3/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 3/5

Write a review

Ran this server? Tell other teams how it went. You get one review per server. We email you a link to confirm it, then an editor checks it before it goes up. We never show your email.

How was it overall?

Would you trust it in production?
Would you recommend it to another team?

Score the details

Setup & docs
Auth experience
Reliability
Maintainer responsiveness

Tell other teams how it went

About you