Our grade: 4 checks
Based on public data, not a full audit. See how we grade. Something changed? Request a re-grade.
Community rating
- 5 10
- 4 5
- 3 2
- 2 0
- 1 0
Trust in production
- Trust it - 76%
- With caveats - 12%
- Wouldn't - 12%
88% would recommend this server
How reviewers scored it
- Setup & docs 4.4
- Auth experience 4.2
- Reliability 4.4
- Maintainer responsiveness 4.1
Why it got an A
Kinovi's own hosted server for running video, image and audio generation models from an agent. Kinovi is operated by Vixion Technology Limited. The docs label the server and its OAuth flow beta and warn that tool schemas, scopes and client setup may change. Of the eight tools, only create_task charges credits, and it charges as soon as it's called. The docs list no account-wide or per-connection spending limit. The one server-side cap is maxCredits, an optional whole number you set per task, and it's checked against the amount charged at submission; models billed by actual usage are adjusted when the task finishes, so the final charge can differ slightly. There's no cancel tool, so a submitted task runs and is charged, and asking you to approve first is up to your client, not the server. Credits are prepaid packs with no subscription, so your balance is the ceiling, new accounts can run 3 tasks at once, and failed tasks are refunded. Sign-in is OAuth with PKCE and two scopes, mcp:read and mcp:write, which you can revoke under API Keys > Connected apps. API keys always carry both scopes, and the client pages don't say how to pick read-only at sign-in, so keep the balance small if an agent has write access. The docs say prompts aren't used for training and uploaded files are deleted after about 24 hours. No advisories on record. Biggest deduction: the server is closed source and the only dated sign of work on it is its docs, last changed 25 October 2026, so we can't confirm who maintains it, and maintenance is scored one band lower.
How to connect
// .cursor/mcp.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"kinovi": { "url": "https://kinovi.ai/api/mcp" }
}
}
claude mcp add --transport http kinovi https://kinovi.ai/api/mcp
Is Kinovi MCP Server safe?
Is Kinovi MCP Server safe to use?
Kinovi MCP Server grades A (strong public trust signals). Updates are occasional, so fixes may be slow to arrive.
Does Kinovi MCP Server have known vulnerabilities?
Not in our current data: it has no open CVEs or advisories. We re-check as new ones are published.
Does Kinovi MCP Server support authentication?
Yes. It requires a login, so access can be tied to a person or a scoped key.
Alternatives in Developer Tools
- A Atlassian Rovo MCP ServerOfficial hosted Atlassian server for Jira, Confluence, Jira Service Management, Compass, Bitbucket, Loom, Goals, Projects, and Teams, with OAuth 2.1 sign-in.
- A Buildkite MCP ServerOfficial Buildkite server for pipelines, builds, jobs, logs, annotations, and Test Engine data, hosted or local.
- A Dynatrace Remote MCP ServerDynatrace's hosted MCP server, running inside your Dynatrace SaaS environment, to run and explain DQL, look into problems, vulnerabilities and Kubernetes events, and forecast time series.
- A GitHub MCP ServerOfficial GitHub server for repos, issues, pull requests, Actions, and code security, hosted or local.
- A GitLab MCP ServerGitLab's built-in MCP server for projects, merge requests, work items, code, and CI pipelines, on GitLab.com or your own instance.
Community reviews
The Kinovi integration I wanted
Been running this for about a month now. The scope options are worth reading carefully, the defaults are broader than I wanted.
Used for Looking up Kinovi data without leaving the editor
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 5/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Set it up once, forgot about it
I use this almost daily. Gave it its own API key so I can revoke it without breaking anything else. Scoped the token to just what the agent needs and it respected that. I would use it in prod, but only with a human approving writes.
Used for Onboarding new devs with an agent that answers repo questions
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Trustworthy enough for real work
Been running this for about a month now. Auth is handled properly, and revoking access later was one click. The OAuth flow worked first time in Claude Code. Happy to run it in production.
Used for Internal developer assistant
- Setup & docs 3/5
- Auth experience 3/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Recommended it to two teams already
Clear tool names, sensible outputs, very few surprises. Release pace is moderate, so I pin a version and check in monthly. Sign-in flow was painless and I never had to paste a key into a config file.
Used for Internal developer assistant
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
OK for read-only work
I like it, with reservations. The API key sits in the config file, so I made a dedicated key with minimal permissions. I like that access goes through a proper sign-in instead of a long-lived secret on disk.
Used for Code review summaries for pull requests
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Earned a permanent spot in my config
Hooked Kinovi MCP Server into Claude Code and it worked on the first try. Scoped the token to just what the agent needs and it respected that. Gave it its own API key so I can revoke it without breaking anything else. Would recommend without hesitation.
Used for Generating boilerplate from existing patterns
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
No complaints after a month
Tried it on a side project first, then rolled it out at work. Release pace is moderate, so I pin a version and check in monthly. Easy recommendation.
Used for Looking up Kinovi data without leaving the editor
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 3/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Saves me a context switch every hour
Hooked Kinovi MCP Server into Claude Code and it worked on the first try. Auth is handled properly, and revoking access later was one click. Being closed source, I cannot audit it, but the vendor has been responsive. Issues get answered eventually. Not fast, not abandoned. It is in our production agent and I sleep fine.
Used for Generating boilerplate from existing patterns
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 5/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Better than the DIY script it replaced
Replaced a homegrown script with Kinovi MCP Server and have not looked back. Hosted endpoint means no local process to babysit. I like that access goes through a proper sign-in instead of a long-lived secret on disk. Happy to run it in production.
Used for Pairing with Claude Code on a monorepo
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 3/5
- Reliability 3/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Worth the five minutes to set up
Installed it on a Friday, it was part of my workflow by Monday. Turned on read-only mode on day one, highly recommend doing the same. Nothing to install, I just point the client at the URL. Issues get answered eventually. Not fast, not abandoned.
Used for Debugging sessions in Cursor
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 5/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Does what it says, no drama
Started with it as an experiment, now it is a fixture. Sign-in flow was painless and I never had to paste a key into a config file. Would recommend without hesitation.
Used for CI failure investigation
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 5/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Easy win for our agent setup
Of the Kinovi integrations I tried, this one is the most predictable. Sign-in flow was painless and I never had to paste a key into a config file. It is in our production agent and I sleep fine.
Used for Debugging sessions in Cursor
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 5/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Quietly reliable
Our agents call this dozens of times a day. Read-only mode is the first thing I enable, and it covers most of what I need. Worth it, just do not skip the hardening steps.
Used for Letting a coding agent open and triage issues
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 3/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Solid and well behaved
Simple to set up in Cursor, simple to reason about. Hosted endpoint means no local process to babysit. I like that access goes through a proper sign-in instead of a long-lived secret on disk. Good choice if you need Kinovi in your agent.
Used for Keeping project tickets in sync with code changes
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 5/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Exactly what I needed from Kinovi
Set this up for our team after comparing a few options. Scoped the token to just what the agent needs and it respected that. Hosted endpoint means no local process to babysit. Easy recommendation.
Used for Scripting routine maintenance tasks
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 5/5
- Reliability 4/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Surprisingly polished
Tried it on a side project first, then rolled it out at work. Nothing to install, I just point the client at the URL. Auth is handled properly, and revoking access later was one click. Updates are a bit slow, but it is stable enough that it has not mattered.
Used for Code review summaries for pull requests
- Setup & docs 5/5
- Auth experience 5/5
- Reliability 5/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Solid core, fiddly setup
Mostly reliable, with the odd timeout. I would prefer to read the code, but the hosted service has been dependable. For anything real I would look elsewhere.
Used for Automating release notes
- Setup & docs 4/5
- Auth experience 4/5
- Reliability 3/5
- Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Write a review
Ran this server? Tell other teams how it went. You get one review per server. We email you a link to confirm it, then an editor checks it before it goes up. We never show your email.