VendorArgo Project (argoproj-labs)
Connects overstdio, http

Our grade: 4 checks

Login Login required, broad access
Upkeep Moderate · 2026-10
Known bugs 0 open
Connection stdio, http

Based on public data, not a full audit. See how we grade. Something changed? Request a re-grade.

Community rating

4.0 11 reviews
45% would trust it in production
  • 5 4
  • 4 4
  • 3 2
  • 2 1
  • 1 0

Trust in production

  • Trust it - 45%
  • With caveats - 55%
  • Wouldn't - 0%

82% would recommend this server

How reviewers scored it

  • Setup & docs 3.9
  • Auth experience 4.0
  • Reliability 3.9
  • Maintainer responsiveness 3.7

Why it got a B

The Argo CD MCP server (Apache-2.0, TypeScript, npm argocd-mcp), first built at Akuity and now kept in the Argo project's argoproj-labs org. It talks to the Argo CD API with one API token you give it in an env var (or an HTTP header). Tools list clusters and applications, read resource trees, managed resources, events and workload logs, and create, update, sync and delete applications or run resource actions. MCP_READ_ONLY=true removes the five write tools. A token registry file lets one server reach several Argo CD instances without the token ever going to a host it wasn't meant for. In August 2026 a critical advisory showed 0.8.0's HTTP mode listening on every network interface with no password, so anyone who could reach it could deploy through your token; 0.9.0 fixed it the same day by binding to localhost and requiring MCP_AUTH_TOKEN for a wider bind. Biggest deduction: write tools are on by default and run with whatever your Argo CD token can do, so start with MCP_READ_ONLY=true and a token limited to the projects the AI should touch.

How to connect

// .cursor/mcp.json (README)
{ "mcpServers": { "argocd-mcp": { "command": "npx",
  "args": ["argocd-mcp@latest", "stdio"],
  "env": { "ARGOCD_BASE_URL": "<argocd_url>",
    "ARGOCD_API_TOKEN": "<argocd_token>" } } } }

Is Argo CD MCP Server (argocd-mcp) safe?

Is Argo CD MCP Server (argocd-mcp) safe to use?

Argo CD MCP Server (argocd-mcp) grades B (solid, with minor gaps). Login is required, but access is coarse: one sign-in or key covers more than your agent needs, so grant the narrowest account you can. Updates are occasional, so fixes may be slow to arrive. It runs locally over stdio, so it acts with your machine's access.

Does Argo CD MCP Server (argocd-mcp) have known vulnerabilities?

Not in our current data: it has no open CVEs or advisories. We re-check as new ones are published.

Does Argo CD MCP Server (argocd-mcp) support authentication?

Yes. It requires a login, so access can be tied to a person or a scoped key.

Embed this badge

Maintain this server? Add the grade to your README.

TrustedMCP grade B

Markdown

[![TrustedMCP grade B](https://trustedmcp.io/badge/argocd-mcp.svg)](https://trustedmcp.io/servers/argocd-mcp)

HTML

<a href="https://trustedmcp.io/servers/argocd-mcp"><img src="https://trustedmcp.io/badge/argocd-mcp.svg" alt="TrustedMCP grade B" height="80"></a>

Community reviews

Keiko Mori SRE
Trusts in production Recommends

Set it up once, forgot about it

Of the Argo CD (argocd-) integrations I tried, this one is the most predictable. The Docker image made setup trivial and keeps it isolated. It is in our production agent and I sleep fine.

Used for Checking deploy status from chat

  • Setup & docs 5/5
  • Auth experience 5/5
  • Reliability 4/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Rosa Morales Platform engineer
Trusts with caveats Recommends

Better than the DIY script it replaced

Clear tool names, sensible outputs, very few surprises. Release pace is moderate, so I pin a version and check in monthly. Auth is handled properly, and revoking access later was one click.

Used for Managing preview environments

  • Setup & docs 4/5
  • Auth experience 4/5
  • Reliability 4/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Ingrid Nilsson Full-stack developer
Trusts with caveats Recommends

Solid core, fiddly setup

It does the job, but it took some tweaking. Auth is handled properly, and revoking access later was one click.

Used for Cost checks across projects

  • Setup & docs 3/5
  • Auth experience 3/5
  • Reliability 2/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Tomas Novak Staff engineer
Trusts in production Recommends

Quietly reliable

Installed it on a Friday, it was part of my workflow by Monday. Auth is handled properly, and revoking access later was one click. Running it in Docker keeps it away from the rest of my machine. Happy to run it in production.

Used for Cost checks across projects

  • Setup & docs 4/5
  • Auth experience 5/5
  • Reliability 5/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Lina Haddad Senior developer
Trusts with caveats

Does the job, docs could be better

Good for experimenting, still deciding about production. Issues get answered eventually. Not fast, not abandoned. Sign-in flow was painless and I never had to paste a key into a config file.

Used for Spinning up test resources

  • Setup & docs 3/5
  • Auth experience 3/5
  • Reliability 2/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Raj Malhotra DevOps engineer
Trusts in production Recommends

The Argo CD (argocd-) integration I wanted

Set this up for our team after comparing a few options. Sign-in flow was painless and I never had to paste a key into a config file. Good choice if you need Argo CD (argocd-) in your agent.

Used for Inventory of what is running where

  • Setup & docs 4/5
  • Auth experience 5/5
  • Reliability 5/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 5/5
Ben Carter Platform engineer
Trusts with caveats Recommends

Easy win for our agent setup

Simple to set up in Cursor, simple to reason about. Updates are a bit slow, but it is stable enough that it has not mattered. I like that access goes through a proper sign-in instead of a long-lived secret on disk. Fine in production if you sandbox it.

Used for Checking deploy status from chat

  • Setup & docs 5/5
  • Auth experience 5/5
  • Reliability 4/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Isabel Costa Software engineer, agency
Trusts in production Recommends

Clean integration, sensible permissions

Been running this for about a month now. Scoped the token to just what the agent needs and it respected that.

Used for Reading logs during incidents

  • Setup & docs 5/5
  • Auth experience 3/5
  • Reliability 5/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Noah Fischer Backend engineer
Trusts with caveats

Would not run this unattended

Setup was rough and the result was flaky. Sign-in flow was painless and I never had to paste a key into a config file. Nice that it supports both stdio and HTTP, I use stdio locally and HTTP for the shared agent. The Docker image made setup trivial and keeps it isolated. Keep permissions tight and it is a good tool.

Used for Inventory of what is running where

  • Setup & docs 3/5
  • Auth experience 3/5
  • Reliability 3/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 3/5
Laura Schmidt Indie hacker
Trusts with caveats Recommends

Our team uses it every day

Our agents call this dozens of times a day. Used a fine-grained token with short expiry and it works fine with that. Scoped the token to just what the agent needs and it respected that. Recommended, with sensible guardrails.

Used for Reading logs during incidents

  • Setup & docs 3/5
  • Auth experience 3/5
  • Reliability 5/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5
Vikram Iyer Solo founder
Trusts in production Recommends

Exactly what I needed from Argo CD (argocd-)

Tried it on a side project first, then rolled it out at work. Release pace is moderate, so I pin a version and check in monthly. Scoped the token to just what the agent needs and it respected that. Would recommend without hesitation.

Used for Spinning up test resources

  • Setup & docs 4/5
  • Auth experience 5/5
  • Reliability 4/5
  • Maintainer responsiveness 4/5

Write a review

Ran this server? Tell other teams how it went. You get one review per server. We email you a link to confirm it, then an editor checks it before it goes up. We never show your email.

How was it overall?

Would you trust it in production?
Would you recommend it to another team?

Score the details

Setup & docs
Auth experience
Reliability
Maintainer responsiveness

Tell other teams how it went

About you